<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/stylesheets/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Politics.za: SACP Discusses Going It Alone... Again</title>
    <link>http://www.politics.za.net/articles/2007/02/25/sacp-discusses-going-it-alone-again</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Third world country. First world politics.</description>
    <item>
      <title>SACP Discusses Going It Alone... Again</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Looks like the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;SACP&lt;/span&gt; are &lt;a href="http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&amp;#38;click_id=13&amp;#38;art_id=vn20070225081343372C391297"&gt;still  deliberating&lt;/a&gt; whether or not to split from the tri-partite alliance and contest elections on their own. They&amp;#8217;ve been &lt;a href="http://politics.za.net/articles/2006/06/05/sacp-may-still-go-it-alone-in-elections"&gt;wringing their hands over this for months&lt;/a&gt; now and will only make a firm decision about it in July 2007.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 09:31:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:39e88217-db3c-4bdf-b1c5-b7530a35f12e</guid>
      <author>Farrel</author>
      <link>http://www.politics.za.net/articles/2007/02/25/sacp-discusses-going-it-alone-again</link>
      <category>SACP</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"SACP Discusses Going It Alone... Again" by Stilicho</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Who cares what their decision will be? Most of their top structure would not cross the floor to the SACP (why would they? &amp;#8211; they&amp;#8217;re all very cozy in their positions as Ministers and Deputy Ministers), which means they&amp;#8217;d have very little state funding. They&amp;#8217;d also be unable to raise any money from business, which  means no real election campaign (the ANC spent R100million on their 2004 campaign). They&amp;#8217;d probably come in somewhere between the UDM and ID, should they scrape together the courage to cut the umbilical cord&amp;#8230;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 01:15:23 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:6cb3fa9c-6dfe-407b-823f-f2a0874d4763</guid>
      <link>http://www.politics.za.net/articles/2007/02/25/sacp-discusses-going-it-alone-again#comment-755</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"SACP Discusses Going It Alone... Again" by Farrel</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;ve been wrong so many times before I don&amp;#8217;t even want to attempt here.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:35:15 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:77184c25-3f95-4227-a01d-dbb115c2619e</guid>
      <link>http://www.politics.za.net/articles/2007/02/25/sacp-discusses-going-it-alone-again#comment-752</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"SACP Discusses Going It Alone... Again" by hex</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I have an idea that you already know what their decision&amp;#8217;s going to be, Farrel!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 12:33:52 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:6f30e5bc-6048-40fb-a8a4-f6ddf1556fa3</guid>
      <link>http://www.politics.za.net/articles/2007/02/25/sacp-discusses-going-it-alone-again#comment-751</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

