<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/stylesheets/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Politics.za: Same Sex Marriage To Be Legal?</title>
    <link>http://www.politics.za.net/articles/2005/11/30/same-sex-marriage-to-be-legal</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Third world country. First world politics.</description>
    <item>
      <title>Same Sex Marriage To Be Legal?</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Tomorrow the Supreme Court will decide whether same sex marriages will be &lt;a href="http://www.mg.co.za/articlePage.aspx?articleid=258140&amp;#38;area=/breaking_news/breaking_news__national/"&gt;legal&lt;/a&gt;. Government is actually opposing the case because they believe that parliament should decide on this and not the courts, and I see their point. However in the 9 years since the new constitution has been in effect no law has been made (or amended) legalising same sex marriage despite the equal rights offered to everyone under the constitution regardless of sexual orientation, so I also understand those who have grown a bit fed up waiting.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Funnily enough I was expecting the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;ACDP&lt;/span&gt; to be having a small fit over this but their latest weekly e-newsletter doesn&amp;#8217;t even mention anything about it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:22:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:54b88a0e1dc88e1a29053152aa0726df</guid>
      <author>Farrel</author>
      <link>http://www.politics.za.net/articles/2005/11/30/same-sex-marriage-to-be-legal</link>
      <category>The Judiciary</category>
      <category>National Government</category>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.politics.za.net/articles/trackback/19</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Same Sex Marriage To Be Legal?" by Farrel</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Egads, news travels fast (and in a wierd way). Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 15:28:43 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:</guid>
      <link>http://www.politics.za.net/articles/2005/11/30/same-sex-marriage-to-be-legal#comment-360</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Same Sex Marriage To Be Legal?" by hex</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Well, it&amp;#8217;s legal now. Live and let live, that&amp;#8217;s what I always say.  Political parties would do well to zip their lips (let&amp;#8217;s not jeopardise those votes!). And while we&amp;#8217;re on the subject of matrimony, Farrel, I hear you&amp;#8217;ve got yourself engaged.  Congrats!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 12:34:51 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:</guid>
      <link>http://www.politics.za.net/articles/2005/11/30/same-sex-marriage-to-be-legal#comment-359</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Same Sex Marriage To Be Legal?" by James Clark</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Parliament should have nothing to do with rights protected in our constitution.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;This is why we &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;have&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; a constitution.  We wouldn&amp;#8217;t need one if every human right was to be decided by the majority in parliament.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;This is most certainly a matter for the court.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:01:22 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:</guid>
      <link>http://www.politics.za.net/articles/2005/11/30/same-sex-marriage-to-be-legal#comment-358</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

